User talk:2601:547:1200:BAFD:7C44:EC9B:671:3334

From WikiFur, the furry encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

Hey there. I noticed your activity over at Connor Goodwolf. First off, please calm down and get your edits right from a technical perspective. Mistakenly inserting a second copy of the article in the middle of the first one because you were trying so hard to get what you wanted it is not on, and suggests you're less interested in improving WikiFur than in getting your point across.

Secondly: I had a look at what you wrote, and I'm not super-convinced it's helpful. Aside from the fact that you're duplicating the name that's already in the lede of the article: if you want to assert that someone is lying, you need to attribute that assertion to someone, and back it up with a reference. "I [the editor] think they're lying" isn't particularly helpful. Compare "X says he is working with the police on an investigation about A; Y says he isn't", which identifies the people so readers can make their own evaluation.

Likewise, if you want to say someone is "committing a crime", you need to be specific about what that crime is, and what jurisdiction you're talking about. Most places I am aware of, it's actually not a crime to say where someone lives, even if they didn't particularly want that information to be known. "I don't like it", by itself, is not a crime.

Lastly, a URL redirect to a mile-long Kiwifarms thread is not useful. If there is specific information that you wish to bring up in the context of the article to support an assertion, it should be referenced with a post link. And if it's just someone talking about something that happened somewhere else, like a post on Twitter, we'd prefer that this "somewhere else" be the reference, rather than a place people are talking about it.

If you keep trying to just insert your own version and are not willing to engage with other editors (including the subject of the article) on creating a version which is generally acceptable form a WikiFur perspective, in accordance with our policies and guidelines - perhaps using the discussion page attached to the article for discussion - you may be blocked from editing. --GreenReaper(talk) 13:57, 26 September 2018 (EDT)


This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify him/her. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.