Difference between revisions of "WikiFur talk:Encyclopedia Dramatica Vandal (Meepsheep)"

Latest revision as of 21:53, 26 August 2014

I've flagged this article for deletion. Subject is not a furry, nor, in my opinion, noteworthy enough for an article. Trolls and vandals come, trolls and vandals go.--Higgs Raccoon 20:11, 24 August 2011 (EDT)

What about WikiFur: Encyclopedia Dramatica Vandal (Blu Aardvark)? (detagged for speedy-delete, replaced with "appropriate tag") Equivamp^talk 08:33, 25 August 2011 (EDT)

Personally I'd say that article also has little usefulness.--Higgs Raccoon 01:44, 26 August 2011 (EDT)

As yet I'm not taking sides on whether or not there should be an article. Do keep in mind, however, that the existence of such an article may be viewed by the troll as scoring points. One could argue that an article may be helpful to admins and other users in dealing with a troll, but we need to be careful to avoid or at least minimize content that may provoke further trolling (e.g. a long list of usernames). --mwalimu 11:11, 25 August 2011 (EDT)

I wasn't going to add any more than what was already there. Just three that showed what kind of usernames she created, and her main identifier. Equivamp^talk 13:51, 25 August 2011 (EDT)

It does look like her personal hit score on Wikifur. Enough that she doesn't have a life, she doesn't have to present it to us. =P - Spirou 19:33, 25 August 2011 (EDT)

Woah, I think this page has some value as I found out Meep was a chick. Would not have thought. Ty 01:00, 26 August 2011 (EDT)

To Spirou, above: This is my concern, too, that a troll may be motivated by such a page to see how many defunct account names they can rack up. To Mwalimu: I think you have a point that it may provoke further trolling, especially since the creator of the page is rather chummy with the vandal it describes, and went out of her way to make sure Meepsheep knew about it.--Higgs Raccoon 01:44, 26 August 2011 (EDT)

lul. I knew you guys stalked me. Equivamp^talk 08:39, 26 August 2011 (EDT)

Stalk you? Don't flatter yourself. The tweet turned up in a routine search for "wikifur".--Higgs Raccoon 09:47, 26 August 2011 (EDT)

Delete, no question. -- Sine 13:49, 26 August 2011 (EDT)

If this was deleted...[edit]

Then WikiFur:Encyclopedia Dramatica Vandal (Blu Aardvark) should be deleted. My suggestion to do such on the article itself was ignored. Equivamp^talk 14:32, 26 August 2011 (EDT)

Can you actually believe this is the first time I have seen this one?. o-O That was the surprise of the day. How do you miss an article? - Spirou 18:05, 26 August 2011 (EDT)

I only found it recently. That was why I wrote this one. It was said on that article "it's Wikipedia's policy, we're trying to do it here too" or something similar. And since Meepsheep has been just as, if not more, troublesome, I assumed I was free to write this one. (Though I asked about it first, and was never responded to.) It doesn't bother me that this is gone, but having the other one remaining for the same reasons this one was written seems fishy. Equivamp^talk 18:12, 26 August 2011 (EDT)

No biggie,... That's why we make the rounds =) - Spirou 18:17, 26 August 2011 (EDT)

It was set up as a "meta page", not a mainspace article, if it's any comfort, Spirou! And things in the WikiFur: namespace do often sit for rather a while. I've stuck a deletion template on the thing. -- Sine 18:42, 26 August 2011 (EDT)

But... But... What About Assume Good Faith?[edit]

Wow, the article was deleted? Really? How surprising the so-called "curators" here actually did something about it this time around. Maybe if they took an active stance against the trolls more often instead of turning situations like these into six-month uphill battles they wouldn't lose quality contributors to WikiFur.

I could say more, but I'd be wasting my virtual breath and it's all been talked to death anyway. —Xydexx

I'm not sure this is an "active stance against the trolls". It was dealt with with commendable spped, I'll admit. Though I'm sure that has more to do with, "I don't like this person, why is there an article?" than anything else. *shrug* Equivamp^talk 18:16, 26 August 2011 (EDT)

Meepsheep[edit]

This "person" is a known homosexual deviant suffering from USI and dildo rage. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 99.194.161.244 (talk • contribs) .

LOL. Interstellar Shipping & Trading Co. (talk) 21:53, 26 August 2014 (EDT)