Talk:Amanda Lillianne Drasciir
From WikiFur, the furry encyclopedia.
Amanda's player has been romantically linked with exiled Eka's Portal member BradRepko for the past five years. --This is a fact. You can ask herself, but the relationship has been documented on Eka's Portal for years.
- If there is documentation, then can you please provide a link so that it can be referenced in the article itself as proof? SilverserenC 05:18, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with my fellow editor here. To present something as fact, it must be verifiable as such. Otherwise, it is an allegation and not a fact. --CodyDenton 05:25, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- I don't think I like what you're implying here. I am BradRepko, I can confirm for myself that I have been romantically involved with Amanda. Being banished from Eka's Portal makes it kinda hard to find the records you are asking for. I can use a proxy server to access it, but I can't actually record the URL. It's there though, there is mention of it in one of my old threads, as well as my old blog on that site. Why don't you take a look for yourself.
- Why don't you have Amanda get you the necessary links to provide documentation? Since it's her page and everything. SilverserenC 17:16, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- That would be great if it wasn't for the fact that she has an exam tomorrow and won't be on until after then. Anyway, seeing as how I'm the one who has been going out with her for five years, I'm a first party in the information. You can't get any more exclusive than that. Besides, it's a well known and documented fact.
- The thing is, all the stuff that I can find is all from your side. Things you have said on Eka's Portal or things you have written, but I can find absolutely nothing from her side, which is what I would need to verify this. Yes, you're the first party, but we need counter-confirmation to prove that you are telling the truth. And, i'm sorry, but this is slightly creepy...It's things like that and the lack of response from her end that makes me wonder if this isn't a one-sided "relationship", which is why I need confirmation from her end of things. If she's not going to be on until after tomorrow, then have her get on after that and find the necessary proof. Until then, i'm afraid that this statement cannot be shown on this article. SilverserenC 17:40, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- People who have known her for awhile known we are involved. If you'd bother asking around, you'd find out with a bit of digging.
- It is not someone else's job to verify it. This is not a personals site. If you want the whole fandom to know of your supposed romantic involvement (to which I ask, WHY?), then by all means, provide source material. Otherwise this is, as Silver seren noted, unproven rumor. I will also ask you to not remove the {{disputed}} and {{fact}} tags again until a consensus has been reached that the burden of proof has been met. Those tags, once placed, may not be removed by an individual editor -- especially not the editor who is making the controversial posts in the first place. They may only be removed when a consensus has been reached on the talk page. I am sorry that you feel so much pain and loathing towards this community now. This encyclopedia is not the place to use as your megaphone, however. With the exception of your Talk pages, the content of these articles is owned by the COMMUNITY, not by any one person. Please respect this fact, and keep things neutral. --CodyDenton 18:17, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- Considering that I've been with Amanda long before she knew Ria, and yet you mention him in her article, I fail to see this as any more than mere bias. The fact that all the information you link to is from a site that I can't access means all the information on her page is unverifiable by me. When Amanda's player gets back from her exams, I'm going to make sure she tears you people a new one. By the time she is through with you, you wretched vermin will be begging for my forgiveness.
- It is not someone else's job to verify it. This is not a personals site. If you want the whole fandom to know of your supposed romantic involvement (to which I ask, WHY?), then by all means, provide source material. Otherwise this is, as Silver seren noted, unproven rumor. I will also ask you to not remove the {{disputed}} and {{fact}} tags again until a consensus has been reached that the burden of proof has been met. Those tags, once placed, may not be removed by an individual editor -- especially not the editor who is making the controversial posts in the first place. They may only be removed when a consensus has been reached on the talk page. I am sorry that you feel so much pain and loathing towards this community now. This encyclopedia is not the place to use as your megaphone, however. With the exception of your Talk pages, the content of these articles is owned by the COMMUNITY, not by any one person. Please respect this fact, and keep things neutral. --CodyDenton 18:17, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- People who have known her for awhile known we are involved. If you'd bother asking around, you'd find out with a bit of digging.
- The thing is, all the stuff that I can find is all from your side. Things you have said on Eka's Portal or things you have written, but I can find absolutely nothing from her side, which is what I would need to verify this. Yes, you're the first party, but we need counter-confirmation to prove that you are telling the truth. And, i'm sorry, but this is slightly creepy...It's things like that and the lack of response from her end that makes me wonder if this isn't a one-sided "relationship", which is why I need confirmation from her end of things. If she's not going to be on until after tomorrow, then have her get on after that and find the necessary proof. Until then, i'm afraid that this statement cannot be shown on this article. SilverserenC 17:40, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- That would be great if it wasn't for the fact that she has an exam tomorrow and won't be on until after then. Anyway, seeing as how I'm the one who has been going out with her for five years, I'm a first party in the information. You can't get any more exclusive than that. Besides, it's a well known and documented fact.
- Why don't you have Amanda get you the necessary links to provide documentation? Since it's her page and everything. SilverserenC 17:16, 20 July 2010 (UTC)