Difference between revisions of "User talk:Spirou"

Revision as of 10:16, 17 September 2019

Please leave message for me by editing this page below the break, I will leave a reply for you later here and/or on your own page.

• (Older conversations have been archived. Please view the links on the right to review old threads.)

_______________________________________

Myrra

hey thanks for banning the (I don't have a name so the number thing will have to do) 2601:281:c000:4fa5:b159:457a:db9b:98db guy i saw the vandalizaton when i was bored going through recent changes. let me know if there's anything else i can do to help the wiki

--Myrra (talk) 16:00, 7 April 2019 (EDT) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Myrra (talk • contribs) .

No problem =) - Spirou (talk) 22:18, 11 April 2019 (EDT)

Hey There

So I noticed you used to work for Warner Bros. That's pretty cool actually. --DuskTheRaccoon (talk) 12:33, 10 April 2019 (EDT)

Still do, as a freelancer from time to time. - Spirou (talk) 22:18, 11 April 2019 (EDT)

I see. I also noticed you're quite active on this wiki a lot. I seem like the only other person actively updating this wiki. Well us and GreenReaper (the owner). --DuskTheRaccoon (talk) 22:33, 11 April 2019 (EDT)

There are, and always have been, many transient editors - in any given month, edits by occasional visitors (most interested only in specific topics) tends to be roughly equal to that of established contributors. Traffic fallen over the years, and edits roughly in line with that, but to a point; and in the last few months it increased. I've adjusted our settings to encourage the use of HTTPS, which Google favours - most visits come through search - and it seems to be working, inasmuch as they've switched over from HTTP. Colleagues are often busy (as I have been) but drop in occasionally; WikiFur's been up for 5000 days, and you can't expect people to stick around all the time. (Oddly the top three main-namespace editors by edit count all have about the same number of main-namespaces edits; but activity differs in other namespaces.) --GreenReaper^(talk) 17:46, 16 April 2019 (EDT)

Hmmmm good point. Well I've been helping to update this wiki the best I can. The YouTube article definitely needed some work lol --DuskTheRaccoon (talk) 18:03, 16 April 2019 (EDT)

Noodles

I have tried to politely fix the discrepancies with my wikifur page for a few months now. I noticed that you are the one who keeps changing it to false information. If you would like to learn the actual details, please contact me. Otherwise if the page is not fixed by the end of July, I will be seeking legal counsel. Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NoodleDoodle (talk • contribs) .

If you had used this your real handle all this time when making all those edits, instead of different suspicious anon IP addresses, we wouldn't be here and now, wouldn't we?. But, hey, you learn something new every day, don't you?. =) Oh, and the legal threat?, no, no so much (that is something else you learned today). - Spirou (talk) 23:07, 3 July 2019 (EDT)

I should not have to disclose my identity to fix false information. If you ever need help getting correct information there are proper ways to do it. Posting false claims as fact is a little harmful to not only those involved but the lives of those around them, you silly little goose :D

Also to add, as you can see, I literally just made this account today just so I could message you —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NoodleDoodle (talk • contribs) .

Hey if they keep updating your account with false info about you and removing the true info, that’s textbook slander and you can 100% pursue legal action, as well as you should. And to Spirou, that legal threat is valid as you committed slander. So yes, yes so much.

Kitsugai

Hey there. Regarding the lemonbrat debacle. It was a pretty big even that got a lot of attention in the community. She is trying to cash in on the drama she created so it’s only fair that the whole story be known. Just because it was resolved does not mean it didn’t happen and people should know about it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:603:4d00:6:a851:8ca3:9ad6:d6e4 (talk • contribs) .

You just proved that you hide the truth and event based on your own opinions, not facts and therefore have proven yourself to be biased and untrustworthy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:603:4d00:6:a1b5:3b03:1346:9c79 (talk • contribs) .

The matter with the fursuit was solved, period, and "hearsay" is not valid info, by the way. You are taking the side of Lemonbrat to bash the other user with unreferenced/NPOV statements under the guise of reporting a possible "beware" situation. Slam the user directly if you wish, don't hide behind the, again, resolve, non-notable, fursuit matter. - Spirou (talk) 23:15, 18 August 2019 (EDT)

Except I provided a link directly to the beware and included exactly what had happened. Just because what had happened made Camaro turn out worse

That doesn’t mean bias, that means truth. The mere fact you are calling easily shown and proven circumstances bias just shows your own. And again, what part of just because something is solved doesn’t mean it didn’t happen do you not get. That’s like saying that someone killed someone was found guilty, does that mean it didn’t happen? No, it doesn’t. Way to hide the actions of another person and taking her side ignoring legitimate proof. Good to know that this site is about as bad as encyclopedia Dramatica, if not worse as you peddle in bias and lies. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:603:4d00:6:c5aa:f3be:e87a:710c (talk • contribs) .

I looked through what was on the page, and it definitely is not worded with NPOV, and cites no other sources other than the beware, which quite frankly, doesn't even put the situation in favor of Lemonbrat as the wiki text did, that's pretty obvious by reading the comments of the beware posting. There is no bias here - if someone had posted something bashing Lemonbrat, we'd have dealt with it in the same way. --FrostTheFox ^(talk) 21:58, 24 August 2019 (EDT)

Excuse me, I've got a question for you!

How come you deleted that "To whom it may concern..." message from WikiFur? This is a VERY serious message I put on the talk pages of Scotty Arsenault and Commander Kitty!

So, did you get it? I need the answer now! Thank you!

--83.185.35.154 01:02, 31 August 2019 (EDT)

Yes, it was reverted because you erased other users posts on those articles. Now take this one out or I will take it out for message spamming. - Spirou (talk) 02:28, 31 August 2019 (EDT)

I'm DEEPLY sorry, Spirou! I did NOT mean to erase other users posts on those articles! I don't know what to do, but PLEASE don't block me! :'( --83.185.35.154 02:59, 31 August 2019 (EDT)

From ThatOneGuyIncognito

Hey yo, if it's anything on your mind, visit my talk page! I'm ThatOneGuyIncognito, and I'm expecting you there! See ya! ;) --ThatOneGuyIncognito (talk) 08:19, 31 August 2019 (EDT)

From Fruxuyup Artist

Hello. I am writing to request personal exclusion from the website. There is currently a page to the same name as the one above, which I wish to be removed. Thank you. -Fruxuyup Artist (18/09/2019)