Difference between revisions of "Talk:Amanda Lillianne Drasciir"
From WikiFur, the furry encyclopedia.
Silver seren (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::That would be great if it wasn't for the fact that she has an exam tomorrow and won't be on until after then. Anyway, seeing as how I'm the one who has been going out with her for five years, I'm a first party in the information. You can't get any more exclusive than that. Besides, it's a well known and documented fact. | :::That would be great if it wasn't for the fact that she has an exam tomorrow and won't be on until after then. Anyway, seeing as how I'm the one who has been going out with her for five years, I'm a first party in the information. You can't get any more exclusive than that. Besides, it's a well known and documented fact. | ||
::::The thing is, all the stuff that I can find is all from your side. Things you have said on Eka's Portal or things you have written, but I can find absolutely nothing from her side, which is what I would need to verify this. Yes, you're the first party, but we need counter-confirmation to prove that you are telling the truth. And, i'm sorry, but [http://aryion.com/forum/blog/BradRepko/where_is_my_beloved_b-5491.html this] is slightly creepy...It's things like that and the lack of response from her end that makes me wonder if this isn't a one-sided "relationship", which is why I need confirmation from her end of things. If she's not going to be on until after tomorrow, then have her get on after that and find the necessary proof. Until then, i'm afraid that this statement cannot be shown on this article. <font color="silver">[[User:Silver seren|Silver]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Silver seren|seren]]</font><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]]</sup> 17:40, 20 July 2010 (UTC) | ::::The thing is, all the stuff that I can find is all from your side. Things you have said on Eka's Portal or things you have written, but I can find absolutely nothing from her side, which is what I would need to verify this. Yes, you're the first party, but we need counter-confirmation to prove that you are telling the truth. And, i'm sorry, but [http://aryion.com/forum/blog/BradRepko/where_is_my_beloved_b-5491.html this] is slightly creepy...It's things like that and the lack of response from her end that makes me wonder if this isn't a one-sided "relationship", which is why I need confirmation from her end of things. If she's not going to be on until after tomorrow, then have her get on after that and find the necessary proof. Until then, i'm afraid that this statement cannot be shown on this article. <font color="silver">[[User:Silver seren|Silver]]</font><font color="blue">[[User talk:Silver seren|seren]]</font><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]]</sup> 17:40, 20 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::::People who have known her for awhile known we are involved. If you'd bother asking around, you'd find out with a bit of digging. However, you've gone and offended me now, so expect a cease and desist order from her in the near future demanding that you remove all mention of her from your <i>pathetic</i> little site. | ||
Revision as of 13:48, 20 July 2010
Amanda's player has been romantically linked with exiled Eka's Portal member BradRepko for the past five years. --This is a fact. You can ask herself, but the relationship has been documented on Eka's Portal for years.
- If there is documentation, then can you please provide a link so that it can be referenced in the article itself as proof? SilverserenC 05:18, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with my fellow editor here. To present something as fact, it must be verifiable as such. Otherwise, it is an allegation and not a fact. --CodyDenton 05:25, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- I don't think I like what you're implying here. I am BradRepko, I can confirm for myself that I have been romantically involved with Amanda. Being banished from Eka's Portal makes it kinda hard to find the records you are asking for. I can use a proxy server to access it, but I can't actually record the URL. It's there though, there is mention of it in one of my old threads, as well as my old blog on that site. Why don't you take a look for yourself.
- Why don't you have Amanda get you the necessary links to provide documentation? Since it's her page and everything. SilverserenC 17:16, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- That would be great if it wasn't for the fact that she has an exam tomorrow and won't be on until after then. Anyway, seeing as how I'm the one who has been going out with her for five years, I'm a first party in the information. You can't get any more exclusive than that. Besides, it's a well known and documented fact.
- The thing is, all the stuff that I can find is all from your side. Things you have said on Eka's Portal or things you have written, but I can find absolutely nothing from her side, which is what I would need to verify this. Yes, you're the first party, but we need counter-confirmation to prove that you are telling the truth. And, i'm sorry, but this is slightly creepy...It's things like that and the lack of response from her end that makes me wonder if this isn't a one-sided "relationship", which is why I need confirmation from her end of things. If she's not going to be on until after tomorrow, then have her get on after that and find the necessary proof. Until then, i'm afraid that this statement cannot be shown on this article. SilverserenC 17:40, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- People who have known her for awhile known we are involved. If you'd bother asking around, you'd find out with a bit of digging. However, you've gone and offended me now, so expect a cease and desist order from her in the near future demanding that you remove all mention of her from your pathetic little site.
- The thing is, all the stuff that I can find is all from your side. Things you have said on Eka's Portal or things you have written, but I can find absolutely nothing from her side, which is what I would need to verify this. Yes, you're the first party, but we need counter-confirmation to prove that you are telling the truth. And, i'm sorry, but this is slightly creepy...It's things like that and the lack of response from her end that makes me wonder if this isn't a one-sided "relationship", which is why I need confirmation from her end of things. If she's not going to be on until after tomorrow, then have her get on after that and find the necessary proof. Until then, i'm afraid that this statement cannot be shown on this article. SilverserenC 17:40, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- That would be great if it wasn't for the fact that she has an exam tomorrow and won't be on until after then. Anyway, seeing as how I'm the one who has been going out with her for five years, I'm a first party in the information. You can't get any more exclusive than that. Besides, it's a well known and documented fact.
- Why don't you have Amanda get you the necessary links to provide documentation? Since it's her page and everything. SilverserenC 17:16, 20 July 2010 (UTC)